Since we're not going to get a ONE experiment which eliminates ALL Fakes I'm moving towards a slightly more probabilistic approach

http://lenr.qumbu.com/rossi_ecat_proof_frames_v501.php

I've added a 2x2 evaluation to each method (fake material):
We also estimate the Fake's Feasibility (could it be made) and Concealability (could it escape immediate detection). For example, a fake powered by Batteries is both Feasible and Concealable. One powered by Diesel fuel is Feasible, but since its output fumes would instantly be noticed, it is not Concealable.
Clearly this ranking is subjective, and would be different for different volumes.

This gives a five-step scale (which I display with a color code) :

  Feasible, Concealable       -- RED
  Feasible, Not Concealable  -- PINK
  Not Feasible, Concealable -- YELLOW
  Not Feasible, Not Concealable -- PALE GREEN
  Real (ie all fakes eliminated)  -- GREEN

These colors are shown both for the materials, and for an experiment in which a fake is not eliminated.

I'm also working on an automatic generation of a table of the "best" (and maybe "worst") fakes for each experiment -- but it's in development and not working correctly.

Also, I've changed the name of the files to include "proof" rather than "fake".

Reply via email to