On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Heat, it is claimed, can be measured to mW, the helium, it is claimed, is >>> orders of magnitude above the detection limit, and yet the errors are huge. >>> >> >> Notice that Cude doesn't mention how accurately the helium can be >> measured. > > > No one said the helium is orders of magnitude about the detection limit. > That's absurd. If it was, we would probably be able to zero in on the exact > process that created it. > No one? Well lomax did. You know, the guy who did such a good analysis. He said it in this forum, on Feb 22: > That is simply not true, again. They are not working close to detection limits, what made you think that? They are, if I'm correct, three orders of magnitude above detection limit. They are working around or sometimes below ambient, a very different issue. 3 is plural right, so it's accurate to say "orders of magnitude". Anyway, Miles claims orders of magnitude too. Remember, they eyeballed 3 peak sizes and assigned them at the detection limit (poorly known), and one and two orders above the detection limit. I know, pretty sloppy. But there you are. So, why can't they zero in on the exact process?
