At 05:21 PM 5/24/2011, Joshua Cude wrote:
Part 2B
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Abd ul-Rahman
Lomax <<mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]> wrote:
> The thrust of the Gozzi paper is opposite to
what Cude wants us to conclude from his
citation of it. In the body of the paper, Gozzi concluded this:
> [yada, yada, yada,
On the other hand, the
low levels of 4He do not give the necessary
confidence to state definitely that we are
dealing with the fusion of deuterons to give 4He
yada, yada yada ]
> This is far, far stronger than Cude implies.
Cude cannot be trusted, at all.
So, Cude has *again* extracted a statement from
it's context (replacing crucial text with
"yada"), a context which makes it clear that Cude's interpretation is a lie.
'Nuff said.
I have not read the rest of his trash. I have actual research to do.
