SCALE-UP- the problem was already shown at the first virtue; modular scale-up is not genuine scale up., IMHO. It has to be more than addition of many small units. Question- why it was made a scale down after the first two experiments?

The scale down was for controlability.  The February "130kW" peak was most likely unintended.

ADJUSTABILITY is an other factor. Can the E-cat work at say 50 or 25% of its nominal capacity when we need less energy?

Rossi says it's continuously adjustable, within 1 minute.

CONSTANCY is also needed –all the performances of the generator must be kept at good values during its lifetime, minimum of degradation or weakening.

Rossi implies that the output is constantly monitored and automatically adjusted. He guarantees a 6x amplification, but he probably has plenty of 'amplification' in reserve.

CONTINUITY – it seems that for the time given, the E-cat has a working period guarantee of 6 months. After that the active core has to be replaced with a new one. Does this period include interruptions, idle periods, adjustments if any? Does it refer to the working time, or even the inactive E-cats lose slowly their power -as batteries, for example?.

He's quoted it as 6 months or 4,800 hours at full power.
He hasn't said whether it needs to be replaced at 6 months if used at lower power.
He hasn't said if the hydrogen is introduced continually, or in a single charge.  If in a single charge, I would worry about leakage over a long time.

At 12:15 PM 5/25/2011, you wrote:
Dear Friends,

I have just published  a SWOT analysis of the E-cat.
at my EgoOut blog. SW part.

"Buying the E-cat in sack?" (better not in the sack)

It needs improvement. Please help- waiting crotics
suggestions advices.
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Reply via email to