Steven,
I may be in a minority but I am convinced this is the same reaction as
Mill's, Moller and Langmuir which requires changing states between h1 and h2
but since I am also convinced the Rydberg and hydrinos states are what Naudts
proposed as being "relativistic" or in this case "equivalently relativistic"
due to lack of spatial motion the definition of temperature needed to
disassociate said h2 becomes blurred. That is to say the normal thermal energy
needed to disassociate appears discounted from our perspective - not only
because the nano geometry reduces energy density [opposite of increased density
due to a dense mass or spatial velocity] but more because of the rapid changes
in this density which I posit are the basis of catalytic action and provide an
energy discount toward disassociation.
Regards
Fran
-----Original Message-----
From: OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 8:46 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:A question about how e-Cats manage to self-sustain
Axel, Robin, ... and others.
So far, everyone has danced around offering any conjecture pertaining to my
original question.
The crux of my original question was:
When a "chain" reaction is initiated what are the speculated temperature
ranges, both the high AND LOW VALUES?
Plenty of discussion has been offered up as to the upper limit, which
presumably must be the melting point of nickel.
But so far no one has discussed and/or offered any speculation as to the
lower temperature limit. IOW, how "cool" can the chain reaction be kept
more-or-less sustainable?
Thanks again, in advance.
Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks
