On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Terry Blanton <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:31 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Jones is wrong again. It is a nuclear affect. > > Jones never said it wasn't nuclear . . . just not fusion. I am > beginning to be convinced that this is true. Low Energy Nuclear > Reactions are not necessarily fusion and THAT is the new physics we > need to grasp.
Oh, and BTW, the energy source might not involve nuclear reactions. LOL! Bwaaaha! T
