Not being a mills expert, how do we know the Mills effect is not nuclear? No radiation and/or transmustation?
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 8:50 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > > It may be tough for LENR proponents to swallow, but they better start >> getting used to the likelihood that this Ni-H effect is NOT nuclear. > > > As a long time proponent, let me say that I do not give a fart whether the > Ni-H effect is nuclear or green cheese, as long as it produces far more > energy than chemistry with no pollution. It is hard to imagine any issue > less important than whether it is nuclear or some sort of Mills effect, or > something completely unknown. As long as it works, what difference does it > make what it is? > > > Ahern is getting zero counts above background and no transmutation, but >> with >> excess heat that would ordinarily indicate something non-chemical. Neither >> are others seeing any radioactivity. That is a mixed blessing. >> > > No, it's wonderful! We don't want radioactivity. > > Industrial scale transmutation would be nice, but if energy is all it > produces, that's fine. > > - Jed > >
