Dear Joshua,

OK, I see our modes of thinking are not compatible. I cannot conceive such
experiments without  measurements, I think the large container is a bad idea
and anti-technical, and I believe far analogies are not good in real problem
solving.
But otherwise I have to thank you for inspiring me-and I hope that we will
have opportunities to discuss other Ni-H LENR experiments.

Peter

On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Joshua Cude <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >Joshua,
>
>
> >based on our constructive discussions re
>
> testing the E-cat I have sent the sketch of a protiocol for this experiment
> to Vortex.but you have not noticed it and have not commented it any way-
> even not "I ma not interested more" Because I think such experiments are
> important- here it is again.
>
>
> I gave a pretty detailed description of the sort of think I think would be
> persuasive -- equivalent to the Wright brothers' 1908 demonstration.
>
>
> The problems I have with your protocol have already been mentioned:
>
>
> 1 - it requires quantitative measurements of flow rate and temperature and
> therefore trust in whoever makes them. If that's to be the case, then some
> method of choosing the observers needs to be in the protocol. And that could
> be difficult for reasons Lomax gave: serious skeptics would be unwilling to
> waste time or risk disapproval in getting involved in something that may
> turn out to be an obvious scam.
>
>
> I think it's much better to heat a large container of water with no inlets
> or outlets; 1000L seems like a reasonable amount. Hot tubs can be purchased
> pretty cheaply.
>
>
> 2 - I think the impact would be far more dramatic without any input,
> regardless of how carefully it's measured. As I've said, this not only makes
> the effect more obvious, but in practice, a device that needs input is just
> a slightly improved heat pump. Not revolutionary at all.
>
>
>


-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Reply via email to