Joshua Cude <[email protected]> wrote: Why? The world already doesn't believe it. I don't believe it. And finding > other people's mistakes is a mug's game. I don't believe perpetual motion > claims either, but I'm not about to find errors in every claim. >
That's garbage. No one has found an error in this study or in any other study. You claim you know this is wrong, but you can't give a reason. McKubre has laid out his arguments neatly for all to see. You are the one with no justification. No backup. You are asking to take in on faith that you have some hidden knowledge or some viable reason to doubt this. You are the perpetual motion machine believer here! McKubre's work is solidly based in conventional thermodynamics. Unless you can show an error in thermodynamics and conventional calorimetry, you have no case. You can nitpick Rossi. Anyone can. But you cannot find an error in any mainstream scientific paper. You never have, you never will. You are a faker. A pseudo-skeptic true believer! You think the laws of thermodynamics are wrong, but you have no reason. You think you can compare a Loch Ness photo to SRI calorimetry and that's a valid argument. You don't get a free pass. Anyone can see you have zero credibility. I am sick of your puerile nonsense. I will not respond to you again. If you ever have the guts to write a real paper, let us know. - Jed
