Andrea Selva wrote:
Nope. If you use fuzzy data as input and elastic math a power gain of
1 can easily rise to 6 or even more ...
There is nothing fuzzy about the data. The method Rossi is using has
been used successfully by physicists and engineers since the 1840s,
millions of times. The discussions here about how "wet steam" might
produce a gigantic error are nonsense. No one has demonstrated such an
error with a system like this. No one here has run a test demonstrating
how to make steam with 6 times less energy than it normally takes. That
is impossible.
- Jed
