It won't change much. I used 1.5g/s which gives 3.300W, so, 1.8g/s fits the bill. So, it is just a slightly stronger blow.
- Re: [Vo]:Rossi calorimetry, volume vs mass, etc. Horace Heffner
- RE: [Vo]:Rossi calorimetry, volume vs mass, etc. Jones Beene
- Re: [Vo]:Rossi calorimetry, volume vs mass, etc. Daniel Rocha
- Re: [Vo]:Rossi calorimetry, volume vs mass, etc. Daniel Rocha
- Re: [Vo]:Rossi calorimetry, volume vs mass, et... Joshua Cude
- Re: [Vo]:Rossi calorimetry, volume vs mass... Daniel Rocha
- Re: [Vo]:Rossi calorimetry, volume vs... Joshua Cude
- Re: [Vo]:Rossi calorimetry, volume vs... Daniel Rocha
- Re: [Vo]:Rossi calorimetry, volume vs... Joshua Cude
- Re: [Vo]:Rossi calorimetry, volume vs... Joshua Cude
- Re: [Vo]:Rossi calorimetry, volume vs... Daniel Rocha
- Re: [Vo]:Rossi calorimetry, volume vs... Horace Heffner
- Re: [Vo]:Rossi calorimetry, volume vs... Joshua Cude
- Re: [Vo]:Rossi calorimetry, volume vs... Horace Heffner
- Re: [Vo]:Rossi calorimetry, volume vs... Joshua Cude
- Re: [Vo]:Rossi calorimetry, volume vs... Harry Veeder
- Re: [Vo]:Rossi calorimetry, volume vs mass, etc. Horace Heffner
- Re: [Vo]:Rossi calorimetry, volume vs mass, et... Daniel Rocha
- Re: [Vo]:Rossi calorimetry, volume vs mass, etc. mixent
- Re: [Vo]:Rossi calorimetry, volume vs mass, etc. Horace Heffner
- Re: [Vo]:Rossi calorimetry, volume vs mass, etc. Joshua Cude

