At 06:17 PM 7/3/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Jeff Driscoll <<mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]> wrote:
>> 2. Rossi's assertions of that steam quality can be measured with a
>> Relative Humidity meter (it can't).
>
> Yes, it can.
No it can't, I wrote a detailed email on Vortex as to why it can't,
maybe I should repost it.
Experts in those meters such as Galantini say you are wrong. The
manufacturer's brochure says you are wrong. I suppose they are
right, and you are wrong. In any case, as Storms pointed out, the
steam cannot be so wet as to materially affect the conclusions.
Galantini has never said that "steam quality can be measured with a
relative humidity meter." Not that I've seen. He has certainly not
said that "Jeff Driscoll is wrong." Nor does the manufacturer's
brochure assert that steam quality can be measured with their
equipment, nor does it mention Mr. Driscoll.
Jed you are confusing presumed authorities and what you presume what
they say *means* with your own opinions.
I'm not going to touch the Greek catfight, beyond saying that this is
circumstantial evidence, along the lines of "I must be right because
there are some people I think must be smart who are taking actions
which I intepret as indicating they trust the device." In reality, we
don't know what they have done, for the most part, and companies,
legitimate companies, often hype what they are doing.
It's perfectly legal, until and unless they defraud an investor or customer.
