On 2011-07-12 23:18, Jones Beene wrote:
No - it is more about secrecy and proliferation - and the early history of LENR. Not to mention, when someone asks you not to go public with a conversation, it is considered good-form to honor their request. The LENR-world may never hear from him again.
[snip]
Thanks again for your answer. I understand what you mean and the implications. However, I just found out, that this news was actually already public domain, so no [additional] harm has been probably done by Celani. There's also confirmation that the Rossi-like experiment was actually a Brillouin Energy replication. This is straight from Brillouin Energy CEO Robert Godes, via Next Big Future blog:
http://nextbigfuture.com/2011/07/robert-e-godes-explains-brillouin.html * * * July 09, 2011 [...]
As for the nature of the experiments at LANL, I [Robert Godes] only learned of them late in the day on Friday July 1 2011 and Tom Claytor was on his way out on a trip. He told me the experiment used 2 meters of .1mm Pd wire and 10A pulses. Started with high purity D and produced "lots of tritium." Robert Godes sent him the following Tom, I am looking forward to helping with the LANL replication of BEC experiments. It would be helpful if you could send me an email with information about the experiments you have already performed and results with current pulses and gas loading. His reply yesterday July 8 2011 I will do, but first we have to get a LAUR (classification review).
Tom Claytor at LANL was able to demonstrate nuclear reactions using a test he put together based on the brillouinenergy PPT.
[...] * * *
