On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
> > It is all nonsense and bullshit. The 18-hour tests with flowing water > proved that the large cell is producing ~17 kW. If it did, then the steam should have been a few hundred degrees C in the January test, and not 100C. But of course it doesn't prove anything other than that Rossi and Levi are capable of making unproven claims. The Lewan video proved that the smaller cells are producing lots of steam. A little steam. > The precise amount of steam does not matter because if there was not excess > heat, there would be water at 60°C and no steam at all. > No. In the Lewan demo, the flow rate was lower, and the input power was enough to bring the water to the boiling point. So that means only a small deception, and not a nuclear reaction, is needed to explain the little puff of steam. > > If you do not believe the 18-hour test data, you have no reason to believe > any of the other data, so you might as well drop the subject. > If you *do* believe the 18-hour test data, there is no reason to pay any attention at all to the steam demos, and *you* might as well drop the subject. The attention that you do pay to the public demos shows you have less confidence in the 18-hour test than you claim. > If you don't like the steam tests, and you actually believe this garbage > about people boiling away water with 7 times less energy than it normally > takes, No. The claim is the water is boiling with exactly as much energy as it normally takes, which is 7 times less energy than is needed to boil it away. It's a tricky concept, I know, but I hold out hope that if I say it often enough, you might stop pretending you don't understand it; that you'll take your fingers out of your ears and stop jabbering incoherently to keep you from hearing what you really don't like to hear.
