Rossi could serve many negative examples for a course of "Prestige Management" He reminds me one of the 'casts' of this fable http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Scorpion_and_the_Frog It seems he does not care, because if the E-cat woirks well at the industrial level, these gaffes will be forgotten. Let's wait and see! Peter.
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Akira Shirakawa <shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com>wrote: > On 2011-07-17 21:16, Akira Shirakawa wrote: > >> And this was Rossi's answer: >> http://www.journal-of-nuclear-**physics.com/?p=497&cpage=16#** >> comment-53792<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=497&cpage=16#comment-53792> >> > > It looks like Rossi has updated his answer on JONP, without adding a note > about that. I personally find this "phantom editing" behavior despicable, > but that's the way he communicates to the public after all. This is what the > comment looks like now: > > Andrea Rossi >> July 17th, 2011 at 1:54 PM >> >> Dear Paul Story: >> Very funny: this clown, named Julian Brown, wrote me saying he was an >> officer of the Patent Office and that he wanted give me suggestions. >> I received him to get those suggestions, curious to know about what he had >> to suggest. I was working in my Bologna lab when I received him and he saw >> one E-Cat under test for no more that 30 seconds, after which I invited him >> to exit. He made no tests, he saw nothing, he just has taken a 30 seconds >> glance at a totally closed box. He saw nothing, I said nothing, also because >> he inspired me no trust, because said he is a Quantum Physicist, but said so >> much stupidities that not even a 13 years old student of middle school could >> say, so I understood he was an impostor. >> We agreed, after a short meeting, that he would have mailed to me a text >> of a patent that he thought would have had many probabilities to be >> accepted: I was very baffled, because I could not understand how an officer >> of the European Patent Office could behave like that: he asked me to be paid >> by my company’s shares in change of his help! >> After some day I received from this clown ( who until that moment spoke >> only positively of all what he saw) some text, simply ridiculous, for a new >> patent (I conserve the copies, of course) and in these texts there was >> written that my patent was to be based on an already granted patent made >> from one competitor of mine, obviously a “friend” of his. I made a research >> and discovered that the patent of my competitor he referred to had not been >> granted, but had been refused. Of course he has been sent from such >> competitor to spy and to try to mess up with patents. I wrote him a mail >> inviting him not to contact me again: he was clearly an impostor. At this >> point he made the comment on Ecatnews… >> Conclusion: he lies when he says he made a test, he lies when he says he >> has seen an E-Cat enough to say anything about it (just has taken a 30 >> seconds look), he lies if he says he has seen the steam, he saw nothing >> because the circuit was ermetically closed, he lies when he says that he is >> an officer of the Patent Office (if he is, he made a crime, because he asked >> me, in change of his help, shares of Leonardo Corporation), he lies when he >> says he is an expert of patents, he lies when he says that my competitor he >> works with has a patent on this matter granted in 1995. >> It is clear that somebody, desperate of the fact that a 1 MW plant is >> close to be started up from us, is trying to use all the methods of a snake >> to try to put clubs in the wheels. But all this is just clownery: my plants >> will give evidence in the real market of the validity of my effect. >> It is also clear that at this point I cannot allow any more info or >> courtesy visit before the start up of my 1 MW plant. >> I have evidence, registrations and witnesses of all what I wrote here: BY >> THE WAY, ALL MY LABS AND FACTORIES, FOR SECURITY ISSUES, ARE SUPPLIED BY >> HIDDEN CAMERAS AND MICROPHONES TO REGISTER EVERYTHING WHICH HAPPENS AND IS >> SAID INSIDE. >> Warm Regards, >> A.R. >> > > So he now says he's got evidence backing up his statements about JB. > I wonder if he will actually use that. > > Cheers, > S.A. > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
