Jones,
Thanks for the support, I agree with many of your suggestions for
non-nuclear and sub nuclear reactions. My only goal is to have mainstream
re-consider a relativistic interpretation of Casimir effect where longer
wavelengths are actually subject to Lorentzian contraction not displaced,
which would explain the initiating environment in a manner not violating COE
for gas atoms migrating through changes in Casimir force. It creates an
environment where HUP can be tapped in numerous ways like DCE separating
virtual particle pairs or the endlessly reversed chemical reactions posited for
MAHG, or the quark rearrangements such as you mention as well as many others.
The hydrogen orbital in a Casimir cavity would appear from our perspective
outside the cavity to shrink away while the nucleus dilates away from it on the
time axis. http://byzipp.com/coffee3.gif while remaining unchanged to a local
observer.
Regards
Fran
_____________________________________________
From: Jones Beene [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 11:21 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:Piantelli news
As a parting shot, so to speak - let me chime in with a couple of comments on
Fran's behalf - and others who see cavity-QED as the best answer to
understanding the thermal gain in Ni-H (as opposed to the other proposed
transmutation reactions, including Piantelli, Focardi etc. since they should
exhibit strong residual radioactivity, which is not seen in any data).
The finding of high speed protons in a cloud chamber - even if their
mass-energy on average is less than the several MeV claimed - is most
consistent with a "quark-based hypothesis" for explaining the gain. This is not
"nuclear," per se, but instead is "subnuclear".
The hypothesis does involve the conversion of nuclear mass into energy. And it
is dependent of cavity-QED as the initial driving force.
This hypothesis is an outgrowth and enhancement of Nyman's modeling of quark
interaction, together with the assumption of having IRH - Inverted Rydberg
hydrogen - being formed continuously in the reactor from hydrogen spillover,
collecting in cavities and other details which have the effect of putting
protons into close proximity - within occasional strong force attraction.
http://dipole.se/
In this paper, simulations made with two different kinds of physics software
both show the following:
1. Two protons placed closely together will repel each other most of the time.
2. Two protons shot at each other will bounce off and repel each other most of
the time.
3. However, it is occasionally possible to shoot two protons at each other
with the right speed and *quark alignment* so that they latch onto each other
instead of repel...
IOW quark placement can overcome Coulomb repulsion, in standard physics. No
magic, or new physics, required (so far).
This is where Nyman fails to make the right conclusion. He opines the protons
will fuse, which is impossible in these conditions. However, the net reaction
which is instigated by strong force attraction will still be gainful; and the
driving force must be depletion of nuclear mass (by default). However, this
reaction does not result in either fusion or transmutation normally. It does
result in fast protons and on occasion these may cause secondary reactions, but
net gain is there without anything else.
This suggestion is an alternative to the P-e-P reaction where no deflated or
other improbable kind of electron is involved, and in the end NO fusion occurs.
Two protons in this circumstance would have severe negative binding energy, so
several things could happen, besides fusion.
This is where Nyman falls short - since all we need to know to explain the net
gain without nuclear transmutation is that strong force attraction happens
(which essentially the "free" ingredient) followed by some kind of energetic
expulsion.
Net nuclear mass of the reacting protons is slightly depleted by the extracted
energy (from gluons pions, etc) and this depletion will be recovered from the
zero point field eventually, in order to maintain an expected "average mass
value" of ~ 938.272013 MeV which can vary significantly in individual atoms.
As to the simulation's observation of "occasionally possible to shoot two
protons at each other with the right speed and quark positions" that rings of
the importance of cavity-QED.
This is where protons emerge from Casimir cavities with the "right speed"
having experienced the Scharnhorst-type acceleration. IOW, building on this
mechanism, even when deuterium is not seen in the ash of the reaction, there is
a clear route to strong "subnuclear" gain via proton acceleration away from
another superimposed proton - with which it CANNOT fuse.
... but, needless to say, the complete details are not clear.
Jones
