This is the same old run-around we get from Levi, including willful withholding of information.
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Michele Comitini <michele.comit...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Nope. Even if I did, it would prove nothing, since anyone can write a few >> > lines of ascii text and claim they came from an e-mail. >> That is arguable at least if you use PGP or OpenPGP to sign your >> bytes. I think anyone that sends data on the public should use > > some kind of digital signature system, better if it is based on open >> standards. >> > > Let me state this a little more clearly. A little more categorically. > > I have uploaded 1,200 papers about cold fusion, including some by leading > opponents claiming that cold fusion does not exist, and it is fraud. I have > uploaded a long, detailed list of reasons to doubt that Rossi's results are > real. (The "Rossi hints.") I was one of the first one here to describe Rossi > and his many personal foibles. I said clearly that these foibles make me > nervous, and that I questioned his claims. Until the January demonstrations > I was unwilling to believe these claims -- but of course I never disbelieve > something without detailed knowledge and good reasons. I am skeptic in the > original sense of the word. > > In short, I have demonstrated many times, in many ways, that I am willing > to report the facts about cold fusion, even when those facts are bad for > public relations. Even when they are setbacks that hurt the image of the > field. I have demonstrated that I do not play favorites in disputes when it > comes to uploading papers. I do not ever distort or hide technical facts. I > have a proven track record. I have credibility. > > If Damon Craig does not trust me, and if he thinks I have deliberately > uploaded fake data or exaggerated data into the news section, he can go to > hell. I am not going to lift a finger or take any steps to reassure him that > I am telling the truth. > > - Jed > >
