>Regarding the RH meter -- that's irrelevant. The claims stand without it.
What claims? The pump that erogate 3 times much more water than the maximux rate wrote on the datasheet? Or the “5kW steam” that look exaclty like a 600W steam? >But I don't anything wrong with an instrument that works by CALCULATION. The instrument MEASURE RH and temperature. Then, with a calculation, extract the entalpy, under some assumption (first: that RH measurement is valid). Jed, i’m embrassed. What are your studies? You look like a fool. From: Jed Rothwell Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 3:40 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:[e-cat] Engineer from delta ohm confirms that galantini instrument is useless Mattia Rizzi wrote: Jed Rothwell, it’s over. So you admit the laws of thermodynamics have not been repealed, and 4.2 joules still equal 1 calorie? Good. I am glad that you now agree that calorimetry works and Rossi's claims -- along with all the others in this field -- are valid. It is about time. Regarding the RH meter -- that's irrelevant. The claims stand without it. There is no chance anyone can produce steam with far less enthalpy than the textbook figures. But I don't anything wrong with an instrument that works by CALCULATION. - Jed
