If I remember well for industrial applications when you make a contract for water supply, in much of Italy, you can be provided with 20 m3/h without special request. That is 20000/3600 l/s. Rossi's facility may have that kind of big pipe from the public aqueduct.
mic Il giorno 04/ago/2011 23:14, "Jed Rothwell" <jedrothw...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > Stephen A. Lawrence <sa...@pobox.com> wrote: > > >> If there's something that's not reasonable about it, it's the value: >> 1... Remarkable coincidence, if that's actually an exact 1, as in 1.00. >> > > I believe they opened the tap and watched the flow meter needle, and when it > reached 1 they stopped. That's how I would do it. It isn't an exact value. > Water pressure in a large city in a commercial building is usually stable > and the flow rate will not fluctuate much over 18 hours. > > They told me the rate was "3000 L/h" which is 833 ml/s, not quite a liter. > These are approximations, as anyone can see. Even if they are wrong by a > factor of 10 the excess heat is still tremendous. It is still far more than > most cold fusion devices of this size produce. So I wouldn't worry about it, > and I don't see why the exact numbers make a damn bit of difference. All of > these arguments that it might be far wrong are: > > 1. Preposterous nonsense. There is no chance it off by more than 20%. > > 2. Totally unimportant. Who cares whether it is 1.6 kW or 16 kW?!? It makes > no practical difference. It is like arguing whether Orville Wright flew 100 > feet high or 200 feet high on September 17, 1908. There is absolutely no > doubt he flew that day (look it up; you'll see), and it was high enough to > negate the ground-effect, so it was definitely flying. > > Assume for the sake of argument it is 1.6 kW instead of ~16 kW. Going from > 1.6 kW with a device of this size up to 16 kW or 200 kW is "only a matter > of engineering." There are probably thousands of industrial corporate > engineering teams that could do that. There is no doubt it can be > done. Questioning that is a lot like saying: "Okay maybe Mr. Wright > *can*reach 100 feet, but he'll never get up to 200 feet!" > > > By the way, I sent them yet another message asking for more info, QUOTE: > > What kind of flowmeter did you use? What was the make and model? > > What was the inlet water temperature? You told NyTecnik it was 20°C, and you > told me it was 15°C. > > Did you record the temperature with a computer? If so, please send the data > or a graph. If not, did you keep a lab notebook and write down the > temperatures periodically? > > In NyTeknik Levi reported that there was a large temperature excursion, up > to 40°C. When did this occur, and how many minutes did it continue? > > > If I get a response I will update the LENR-CANR.org news item. > > - Jed
