From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <[email protected]> >To: [email protected]; [email protected] >Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 3:12:23 PM >Subject: Re: [Vo]:How to present arguments against cold fusion critics > >At 06:30 AM 8/11/2011, Jouni Valkonen wrote: >> Therefore if someone knows some high impact factor journals that has >> published recent could fusion findings, I would appreciate to have >> some examples. > >See http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Cold_fusion/Recent_sources > >This is a list of journal and academic publications as found in the Britz >database. Reviews of the field are shown in bold. > >The most significant journal to publish a review is Naturwissenschaften. That >journal is of an importance commensurable with Scientific American, when I did >the research. > >The pseudoskeptical position has almost entirely disappeared from mainstream >journals. There is a little normal skepticism, for example Ludwik Kowalski's >criticism of SPAWAR work. > >I'm aware of other publications of note, for example a textbook on "models of >the nucleus" that treats cold fusion as an experimental reality, recently >published by an expert on nuclear models, not some "cold fusion believer." >
Is this it? p. 175 of _Models of the Atomic Nucleus_ http://tinyurl.com/3py89vx Harry
