Thanks great many Abd ul-Rahman and also Jed. I presented devastating counter-argument to Finnish pseudoskeptics. That Naturwissenschaften article:
Status of Cold-Fusion (Storms 2010) http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/StormsEstatusofcoa.pdf was something that might be worthy of reading while I find some time. So special thank you for that! –Jouni 2011/8/12 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <a...@lomaxdesign.com>: > At 06:30 AM 8/11/2011, Jouni Valkonen wrote: >> >> Therefore if someone knows some high impact factor journals that has >> published recent could fusion findings, I would appreciate to have >> some examples. > > See http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Cold_fusion/Recent_sources > > This is a list of journal and academic publications as found in the Britz > database. Reviews of the field are shown in bold. > > The most significant journal to publish a review is Naturwissenschaften. > That journal is of an importance commensurable with Scientific American, > when I did the research. > > The pseudoskeptical position has almost entirely disappeared from mainstream > journals. There is a little normal skepticism, for example Ludwik Kowalski's > criticism of SPAWAR work. > > I'm aware of other publications of note, for example a textbook on "models > of the nucleus" that treats cold fusion as an experimental reality, recently > published by an expert on nuclear models, not some "cold fusion believer." > >
