Steven, a logical error could be in assuming gravity and antigravity are perfectly symmetric in an inverse way, or that antigravity scales in a similar way as gravity "all the way down".
This may or may not be true, since the big (HUGE) hurdle to overcome first is to document that antimatter is anti-gravitational. There are few experts in this field and no definitive experiments. There are various theories beyond the Standard Model which include attempts to resolve the hierarchy problem, include deviations at very short distances - but no real experiment goes below micron level for gravity AFAIK... hard to build scales that small. Obviously, no evidence speaks to antigravity at close range either. There are a few superficial reasons to suggest why gravity should never be able to be unified with the strong force below picometer, but nothing I have seen is very convincing. You will find vocal advocates of the extreme unification hypothesis, but they are even less convincing (Lazar etc). Bottom line - it is an open issue, and at picometers distances there is nothing indisputable so far - which prohibits a perfect balance of antigravity and electrostatic attraction (which has the effect of stabilizing the epo field into a dense, neutral, static lattice in another dimension). This picture does have a kind of elegance, if it turns out to be accurate. In fact, since antigravity appears repulsive for normal matter - then we might expect antimatter to come with its own repulsive version of the strong force: at least it would be repulsive wrt normal matter. -----Original Message----- From: OrionWorks - > considering the fact that electrostatic forces are probably a on an order of a gazillion times stronger than equivalent gravitational forces. How is there a "perfect balance?" Strikes me more like a big asymmetry. Regards Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks
