One should stay away from E-Cat calorimetry and instead perform calorimetry on the actual nickel-hydrogen reaction. ----- Original Message ----- From: Jed Rothwell To: [email protected] Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 9:59 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Percolator Effect
Horace Heffner <[email protected]> wrote: The correct thing to do is to do calorimetry on the output using a well calibrated professionally designed calorimeter independent of the device itself . . . Defkalion claims they have done this. Alarm bells should go off in your head when you see the amount of discussion this issue has had, and the lack of meaningful progress. Lots of response, but no progress. Just a lot of churning churning churning. Hold on there! I assume you refer to the discussions and churning here, in this group. This has nothing to do with what Rossi and Defkalion are doing. Alarm bells should not go off because people here who have nothing to do with the research and no information about it are speculating. I still find it incredible that it could be expected that anyone would invest a dime in this technology without the most basic and inexpensive science being applied. What evidence do you have for this assertion? How do you know that no one has done proper calorimetry? In their web site discussion group, Defkalion claimed they did, and they claimed the Greek Min. of Energy did as well. No details or reports have been published, so perhaps it is not true, but can you be sure it is not true? - Jed
