A parametric effect for simplicity is classified as a change in inductance over time of the rotation. A seven pole face assembly alternator field in rotation for one cycle will show an increase and decrease of inductance seven times from an LCR meter recording the stator internal inductance which does vary as the fingers of the pole faces become underneath the stator winding metal serving that phase, and eliminating a portion of flux leakage. Indeed the invention of the alternator is to provide a ROTATING FERROMAGNETIC FLUX LEAKAGE FROM A SPECIALLY DESIGNED ROTATING DC ELECTROMAGNET to interact with outer periphery stator windings timed in a manner so that it's phasal windings respond on all the series winds of its interweaved core windings to the seven points of increased inductance via elimination of air gaps in the system when in the seven points of time the pole face fingers go directly underneath the effected ferromagnetic stator phase. This parametric effect of changing the internal parameters of the source internal conditions generating voltage over time to create voltage and current on loads is not merely confined to inductive effects such as this, but also capacitive effects, and even more then this when those effects are coupled together by the made resonance of frequency rotation, they can exceed the normal parameters of operation. This was my first great discovery; that of ferromagnetic resonance; when ordinary observations leads one to conclude that no such resonance can exist. A special circumstance also exists in regards to the inductive parametric effect, where very conclusive experiments have shown that a vector factor of ACTUAL FERROMAGNETIC ROTATIONAL MAGNETISM must be entered into the understanding in order to explain the observed results. The observed results almost amount to a conspiracy of science, where some of us refuse to be silent. What electrical engineer can expound upon the fact that a rotating DC electromagnet interacting with outer periphery stator windings structured as three phase outputs; in order to stop those outer outputs from occuring naturally by the rotational magnetism; CURRENT MUST BE SENT IN THE OPPOSITE DC DIRECTION THROUGH THE FIELD TO PREVENT THE SPONTANEOUS CURRENTS WITH ADDED LOADS AND VOLTAGES THAT DO EXHIBIT THEMSELVES BEFORE THE FIELD CURRENTS THEMSELVES WERE EVEN ENGAGED! In that example of the operation energy must be sent into the device, just to prevent the device from producing energy/ a net loss. >From Faraday, to Maxwell, to Tesla... we begin to wonder, why have the fundamentals of rotating ferromagnetism as a priciple never been taught. Has the student familiar with alternator operation ever been taught that the direction of the DC current to the rotating electromagnet should be in harmony with the established direction of rotation? All of this due to the vector contribution made by rotational magnetism itself? I am such a student and I have not seen such references mentioned myself. I only learned of them by experimental observations. As such I must consider myself to be a pioneer in the field. As such the following video shows the observations made with a rotating alternator producing 465 hz output without the aid of an energized field, AND THEN LATER THE FIELD IS ENERGIZED FOR COMPARISONS OF ACTING RATIOS. Independent phase operation study of 666 pancake system/no field http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KJC5fwr3PGw Sincerely HDN
Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/
