Indeed, Relativity is extemely ugly theory because it is at the fundamental level inconsistent with quantum mechanics (e.g. entanglement and it is classical theory). This means that it is certainly false theory.
And also general relativity is filled with anomaly, because in the scope of general relativity it is impossible to greate universies because it would require, infinite expansion speed. Not to mentioning dark matter and dark energy anomalies that alone are sufficient to falsify general relativity. Therefore there is no doubt that relativity will fail, because there are already too many ad hoc explantions for observations. Question is just when it will fail. Since no-one else than me has evoked cherenkov radiation like explanation, it might indicate that it cannot be the explanation. Thus bye bye relativity! —Jouni Ps. and how much money we are betting here? On Sep 23, 2011 6:58 PM, "Harry Veeder" <[email protected]> wrote: > http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/blogpost/post/neutrinos-may-have-traveled-faster-than-the-speed-of-light/2011/09/23/gIQAo04HqK_blog.html > > <<Post science writer Joel Achenbach says that he’s sticking with Einstein, at least for now, because: > Einstein’s theory... isn’t based primarily on measurements. > Einstein’s theory emerged from thought experiments. It was a deep insight into the nature of the universe. Subsequent experiments for more than a century have verified that he was right. > For the new finding to carry a lot of weight, it would need more than an instrumental measurement. It would need a theoretical foundation. Otherwise you have something that is enigmatic rather than revolutionary.>> > > > At least he calls the finding enigmatic rather than delusional or an error. > > Harry >
