I am not rejecting LENR or every new technology. I am just saying that ecat has been a very reliable device, except for those tests, when an investor was visiting with a very reliable assistance, NASA. Rossi is low on money, anyone in this place would make the best to put some redundancy.
As for Steorn, it is like to argue that is not a scam. They do not have a device to display or even a half baked theory, nor nothing, on how that would work. Saying it doesn't obey the principle of conservation of energy just make everything sound like a very amateur scam. 2011/10/4 Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> > Daniel Rocha <[email protected]> wrote: > > Rossi has several devices at his disposal; > > > NASA has lots of rockets too, but on a give day, only one is ready to > launch. Or not ready as it often turns out. Getting one to work is a > struggle. Every cold fusion experiment I know of is the same way. > > This does not mean that mass produced cold fusion reactors are likely to be > unreliable. > > Cold fusion cells are hand-made, one-of-a-kind prototypes that no one fully > understands. They resemble Edison's first light bulbs, or the early > prototype automobiles and computers. Those things constantly malfunctioned. > This is how real experimental machines are in real life. If you reject > Rossi's claims, or Steorn's for that matter, because the machines are highly > unreliable, you would have rejected every other nascent technology. > > - Jed > >
