I have to disagree that the change in hydrogen pressure wouldn't be almost
immediately obvious. IYou should get an immediate rise in delta T across the
reactor which would immediately boost heat flow. Helium should confirm a
null result- ie no CF and would be used as a control. You should be able to
subtract out the helium data to account for thermal inertia and warm up and
cool down w/ the heater.--- Original Message -----
From: "Jouni Valkonen" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2011 12:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:NyTeknik report on October 6th test
2011/10/7 Joe Catania <[email protected]>:
Lewan's report states that hydrogen pressure was lowered during shut-down.
This is the angle they should have exploited. With constant heating and
water flow conditions they should vary the hydrogen pressure and record
the
results. They should also try an inert gas like helium.
Of course, but unfortunately there was not time to do such thing
(doing such correlative analysis would take several days) . And also,
reaction speed did not react too much for the reducing the hydrogen
pressure.
But test excluded all possible hidden power sources (E-Cat was
weighted before and after the test). Therefore what would be the point
of injecting helium?
–Jouni
