At 12:16 PM 10/10/2011, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
At 11:20 AM 10/10/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote:
I said you will never get to the bottom of this, and it is not worth trying.

You're probably right on that. So we're left with a purely qualitative demonstration. Ah well.

It's buried in Lewan's data -- but as he pointed out in his responses to Krivit, he DID measure the eCat output flow twice (presumably at the usual drain).

18:57 Measured outflow of primary circuit in heat exchanger, supposedly condensed steam, to be 328 g in 360 seconds, giving a flow of 0.91 g/s. Temperature 23.8 °C.

19:08 Hydrogen pressure was eliminated. Flow from peristaltic pump increased. All electric power switched off.

19:22 T
in = 24.2 °C Tout = 32.4 °C T3 = 25.8 °C T2 = 114.5 °C
Measured outflow of primary circuit in heat exchanger, supposedly condensed steam, to be 345 g in 180 seconds, giving a flow of 1.92 g/s. Temperature 23.2 °C.

http://a2.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/304196_10150844451570375_818270374_20774905_1010742682_n.jpg
18:57 0.91 g/sec correlates with a minimum of the power -- 3500 W
19:22 1.92 g/sec correlates to a peak of power -- nearly 6000 W


Reply via email to