The best part here it is that they indeed confirm that Rossi is lying about they not having the necessary know-how to make the core!!!! WOW!
2011/10/15 Terry Blanton <[email protected]> > http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=3407#p3407 > > <begin quote> > > Defkalion GT > Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2011 11:04 am > > Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 6:56 am > Posts: 152 > > > Gaby de Wilde wrote: > > LENR is clearly an area where we don't know what is going on. > > > Dear sir, > with all respect to your opinions or beliefs, we have to express our > strong disagreement with your statement on LENR. > > Out of the more than 1000 peer-reviewed papers on the LENR area (you > can download most of them in http://www.lenr-canr.org/ ), please note > that there are hundreds of active first class scientists and engineers > working hard in the field around the globe. > > It is not correct that "we don't know what is going on". We at > Defkalion know exactly what is going on during LENR reactions in the > core of our products. It is true that the observed phenomena, in some > cases, contradict with the main stream understanding of certain > theories that are considered as standards in academia. In such cases, > we believe that these theories need to be reconsidered or revised > based on the new experimental results and evidence, besides the strong > political and economical implications from supporters or dogmas trying > to maintain the present status in the scientific and the energy field. > > Defkalion is not a scientific institution. Even though, we intend to > support papers with results supported by the measurements from new > instruments we had to develop in order to control and further develop > the technologies embedded in our products, in peer-reviewed magazines > and during the first LENR Industrialization Congress that we plan to > host and support within 2012. We hope that these will also help > science to move forward. > > Thank you for your attention > > <end quote> > > I find the statement, " . . besides the strong political and > economical implications from supporters or dogmas trying to maintain > the present status in the scientific and the energy field" quite > interesting. I wonder what they are encountering which justifies such > a statement? > > T > >
