Today this message was published on Rossi's Blog. Andrea Rossi October 16th, 2011 at 2:14 AM<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=510&cpage=22#comment-97993>
Dear Giovanni: We will run also in self sustained mode, the periods will depend on many factors. In any case, the power output will be 6 times the power input. About the snakes: the time of the snakes is over. The start up of the 1 MW plant is the end of the mental masturbations of enviuos, wannabe theorists, lecturers of calorimetry and engineering. Now LENR goes to the market. The test will not be made by me, but by the Customers’ consultants. Time of chatters is over. Maybe the test will not be good, maybe: it will be the first time I will start up a plant of that dimension, but in this case the problem will be the Customer, not the bunch of imbeciles that instead of understanding that we actually made LENR a reality lose their time digging holes on the surface the water in the middle of the ocean to find the wine. And in the case this test will go not well, we will learn and remake another, and another, and another, but, be sure, we will arrive to the target. At any cost. Warm Regards, A.R. Well written. On the negative side the finale "at any cost" is frightening. Pereat mundus, fiat E-cattus! Who will pay these costs? Obviously the Customer.- an ideal one. On the positive side I like the use of the metaphor of the digging a hole of the Ocean for finding wine despite the fact that it does not describe well the activity of those mentally impaired persons who are not 120% E-cat enthusiasts. Till now the triumph of the 1MW demo was an certainty, now it seems that due to the sabotage of some imbeciles using autodestructive however cheap sexual practices, the !MW setup has lost its technological perfection. Hopefully new details will be known, I am too limited in thinking to see the correlation. The idea that there can be some problems with the Demo has appeared yesterday. Today http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Kkxbw3s2pM we get a message saying "No more tests!" http://ecatnow.com/ecat-news/ecat/no-more-tests-except-for-an-e-cat-home-test-let-the-customers/ I have tried to send a comment, but I fear it will not be published. Here it is: "*The message is not very clear- no more tests before the ! MW demo of Oct 28? No more tests at all? A sellable product most have a specification, instruction of use, must be authorized by some expert bureaucratic organizations, must have a guarantee- safety, performances and so on… You cannot sell an :”E-cat in the sack.”- the title of one of my essays re this subject. Rossi seemed to be enchanted with the October 6 test and all the questions re measurements were considered malevolent nit-picking. How does correlate this decision with some statements of Rossi that some troubles can appear at the triumphal 1 MW test? The great questions is: what is more dangerously immature- this mode of management or the E-cat itself?" * Let me add again and again that 6 thermal energy units for 1 energy unit is a modest less that 2 $ for 1 $ if we ignore investment and some other expenses. Evviva il Customer! Peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
