I meant to write:
> You misunderstand. It is blather because it is not important. Even if you > right, it does not affect the conclusion, and it does NOT reduce confidence > in the results. > You fail to understand that when the s/n ratio is gigantic, you do not need precision to be sure the result is positive. You do not need any numbers at all, in this case. I wish I could correct these messages. I have such difficulty writing these days . . . - Jed
