He doesnt care about precision or truth. He always gives the most advantageous answer when he thinks people will believe this or people cant check this. Thats not important for him and he dosnt care much, because this changes nothing for him.
I do wait for the outcome of the 1MW experiment. 1 MW of steam or heat is nothing that can be easily hidden behind doors and some people that are posting here live nearby. I would wish it is true, but what is mostly interesting for me is the truth itself, it doesnt matter what I wish. I also hope they will test the household e-cat at Upsalla as promised. I trust to Kullander and Essen to do this reliably and believable. I expect more from this than from the 1 MW demonstration. BTW, Kullander and Essen have announced to give a public lecture about nuclear energy and LENR in late november, and I hope to get more conclusive and believable information from this. ----- Original Nachricht ---- Von: Colin Hercus <[email protected]> An: [email protected] Datum: 25.10.2011 08:22 Betreff: Re: [Vo]:Possible mechanism-Excess Power Reading of ECAT > Hi Peter, > > I know Rossi said this but I also know Mats measured a lower rate (0.9g/m) > for a period of 6 minutes and I also know they stated the flow rate was > increased at 19:08 to cool the reaction but if the pump was already at > maximum how could this be done? > > It's perplexing to have all this contradictory information. > > Best Regards, Colin > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 2:14 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Nachricht ---- > > Von: Colin Hercus <[email protected]> > > An: [email protected] > > Datum: 25.10.2011 03:54 > > Betreff: Re: [Vo]:Possible mechanism-Excess Power Reading of ECAT > > > > > Hi Peter, > > > > > > The primary flow is interesting problem. Rossi states 4g/sec which is > > close > > > to 15 kg/h. The specs of the pump give a maximum of 12kg/h at 1.5 bar > so > > if > > > we believe Rossi then the pump must have been running at maximum volume > > but > > > then how can we explain the flow rate of the peristaltic pump being > > > increased at 19:08 if it was already at maximum? > > > > > > > I asked this in Rossis forum and he replied "15kg/h". > > Dont take this like gold, possibly he didnt remember or didnt know and > > then he gives the most advantegeous answer always. > > His answers are not reliable and he is a busy man who has not much time. > > What his answer probably means is: "I dont remember exactly and we did > not > > keep track, but the maximum that the pump can do is 15kg/h and we should > > have reached this at least temporary" > > ;-) > > > > >
