Jed, in your opinion, why does Rossi bother with these demoes, if they don't 
impress fence sitters, and he doesn't need new investors?



Sent from my iPhone. 

On Oct 28, 2011, at 22:37, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I wrote:
> 
> This test has been a colossal disappointment.
> 
> I know Rossi pretty well by now, so I was expecting something like this. 
> Given who Rossi is and how he thinks, this wasn't a colossal disappointment.
> 
> Also, this was not a colossal disappointment to me because, hey, it did not 
> blow up. As readers here know, I was seriously worried the damn thing might 
> explode or irradiate the audience. I am relieved that nothing like that 
> happened. It seemed to work at 1/2 of nameplate power. For a reactor they 
> just finished building, that's fantastic. That is as good as 1 MW.
> 
> Rossi is much braver than I am, or much more foolhardy, or both.
> 
> As you hear in this video, I am not the only one who is worried about 
> radiation and other dangers. So are the Italian authorities, as well they 
> should be:
> 
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rLAdGduQ50A
> 
> Rossi says here that they issued some sort of conditional permit, with 
> restrictions. That is the sort of thing you would expect for an experimental 
> device. That sounds plausible. It is what I would expect a responsible 
> government official to issue.
> 
> I still think it was much too big a reactor, and I still think the test 
> schedule was too fast. But evidently Rossi and the Italian officials share 
> some of my concerns about safety and that's good.
> 
> I predicted that a major company such as GE or Mitsubishi would want to get 
> involved in such risky tests. Perhaps I was wrong and this was a big company. 
> But if it was an up-and-coming profitable, risk-taking place such as 
> Manutencoop, that may be the kind of thing they would get into. Back in the 
> go-go late 1960s, companies such as Data General used to get involved in 
> risky start-up technology. According to "Soul of a New Machine" there were 
> rumors that Data General was involved in some actual physical risk and 
> possibly criminal behavior such as burning down the buildings of rival 
> companies.
> 
> - Jed
> 

Reply via email to