I have been monitoring this argument for quite a while. It is getting humorous. Peter, can you name one scientific experiment that has been conducted where there is absolutely no possible way to scam the results? The level of scrutiny that you seem to subject the ECAT to is incredible. I would venture a bet that you would not accept the reality of this device if you were given one to test for a year. For this suggestion, we shall assume that the ECAT actually is functioning as a LENR device, just you must prove it. What is the reason for the repetition over and over of the same arguments? Please try to come up with new concepts to suggest as we are very aware of the hot air question. I am confident that you can make many important contributions to the vortex with your vast knowledge. Dave
-----Original Message----- From: Peter Heckert <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Tue, Nov 1, 2011 10:41 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi 1MW : Why is the energy hidden behind pressboard? Am 01.11.2011 15:34, schrieb Jed Rothwell: Peter Heckert wrote: > No. if it was hot water, then the energy was 5 times less than 100 kW. > If there was a cold water flow in the other pipe, then it was less > than 50 kW. > If there was a heater near the thermoelement, then it was almost zero. > > Especially Domenico Fioravanti (customer engineer) must know this if > he is an expert. Yes, he is an expert. And as an expert he would have know there was a heater near the thermocouple, or that there was cold water in the other pipe. Any expert would notice this. Heck, I would notice this in an instant. o you have X ray eyes? e did not want to see it. If he had seen it, he had immediately closed is eyes and goto somewhere else. ossibly he was an "independent" consultant and got monetary provision or the sale. othing new. Stuff like this has happened before.
