Peter Heckert wrote:
With the October 6 test there was so much false selfcontradicting
information about Defkalion, Steam, Pressure and so on, and the claims
where not coincident with the observations, for example hot water
shooting out with obviously high pressure while Rossi claimed it is
almost air pressure inside.
Are you talking about the Oct. 6 test? It sounds like the Sept. 14 one.
I mean the one with the heat exchanger, no hot water shooting out.
The instrument readings on that are questionable, but I think the fact
that it remained hot for 4 hours is first-principle proof of tremendous
anomalous heat, as I wrote here:
http://lenr-canr.org/News.htm
I do not see how you can quibble with that.
In this analysis I am assuming there are no hidden wires or chemical fuel.
So I decided to ignore this. To much misinformation. If you dig into
dirt you get dirty so better stop.
There can be no misinformation at the most basic level. 30 L of water in
a poorly insulated container, that was quite hot to the touch (80 deg C
surface temperature) remained very hot for 4 hours. That cannot be
caused by anything other than heat generation. You can ignore all other
aspects of the test, and you can be certain of that. I do not think
there was any misinformation but only confusion. However, if you think
it was misinformation then you should ignore it and look only at the
temperature of that vessel.
- Jed
