Hi Peter, I'm not familiar with these pumps but it has variable rate and stroke and I wonder if someone changed the stroke would the sound change, certainly the frequency wouldn't and it would be really easy to do without being noticed.
Colin On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 6:11 AM, Peter Heckert <[email protected]>wrote: > Am 01.11.2011 22:59, schrieb Mattia Rizzi: > > According to the report, E&K measured the water flow before the test, but >> not *during* the test. >> I asked to Essen and confirmed that they doesn't have measured the flow >> during the test. >> > I had this thougt too, but: > The pump is so loud, any significant change in flow rate would have been > noticed by them. > > If these guys do a positive test in Upsalla then I am ready to believe it. > Im not against this. > > I am against all this contradictions false promises and confusion that > have been since this. > Cannot understand why didnt they give some details about pipes and > heatdissipator for the 1 MW plant and why didnt they measure the > temperatures there. This is most disappointing to me, it is like > demonstrating a car on a brake tester and not letting the rubber hit the > real street. > > Best, > Peter > > > -----Messaggio originale----- From: Peter Heckert >> Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2011 10:43 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi 1MW : Why is the energy hidden behind pressboard? >> >> Am 01.11.2011 22:33, schrieb Jouni Valkonen: >> >>> 2011/11/1 Jed Rothwell<[email protected]**>: >>> >>>> For that matter, why would anyone think the Krivit test was fake? >>>> >>> For Krivit, Rossi /claimed/ the water flow and it was doubted by others >> and this was so early I did not understand everything and was confused >> by Krivits "wetz steam" argument. (I dont believe in wet steam today, >> but at this time I was unsure) >> >> Essen & Kullander /measured/ the water flow, so this was secured >> believable data. When they then found, that the input energy is too low >> for boiling, I was impressed. >> >> >
