Why not attempt to prove it is a scam? I suggest that you will find it is real.
I prefer to have some data as supplied instead of just words as we see from Piantelli and others. Words are cheap. I saw a youtube link where some others talk about great progress. Now, let them show us a device. It may be that some of the snakes are paid by others. I doubt that the reason for their crappy results is because of money, it is more likely that they do not understand what they have seen. Everyone dislikes the crude experimental setups during Rossi's demonstrations. This is not new. A good scientist or engineer can work with the tools he has available. Use your tools. The ECAT is real. Not perfect, but real. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Peter Heckert <peter.heck...@arcor.de> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Thu, Nov 3, 2011 3:22 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Pipe diameter October 28 - new considerations Am 03.11.2011 20:07, schrieb David Roberson: Can you show proof that it is a scam? No. Rossi knows how much scammers are out there and are competing. He often complains about all these snakes that are paid by hostile and fraudulent competition. If he wants to be different then he must show this evidency that he claims. As long as he doesnt do this I cannot decide between Piantelli and Rossi and others I see no difference. Do you see: Piantelli is totally quiet. He does at least not do present crappy demonstrations until now. Possibly Krivit knows better. He has seen a demonstration and discussed with the people, I have not. Best, Peter
