Having the patent granted may not be such an important goal for him at this time. The longer he waits, the further into the future it extends. This reminds me of the submarine patents that come up far into the future when the most money is made. Rossi may be smart as a fox. Eventually it will be accepted.
Dave -----Original Message----- From: Peter Heckert <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Thu, Nov 3, 2011 4:08 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Pipe diameter October 28 - new considerations Am 03.11.2011 20:51, schrieb David Roberson: I am afraid we need an engineer instead of scientist. Engineers get the task completed in a manner that is acceptable for production, at least eventually. Think about this man at Fraunhofer (I dont remember his name) who invented MP3. He tried to get a patent on his ideas, but the patent was refused because the patent examiner said, this is impossible. High bandwidth music cannot been transmitted over a low bandwith channel, this is an eternal law and therefore this is impossible. ;-) Now, he made the alggorithm, proved that it worked and got his patent. Rossi can easily get a patent if he proves it works. No theory is necessary. If he proves it works, he gets a patent without question on his catalyzer. If he wants a patent he has to give prove. Peter
