In reply to pagnu...@htdconnect.com's message of Sat, 5 Nov 2011 23:35:00 -0400 (EDT): Hi, [snip] >Probably, Robin, but the relatively recent discovery of the 65Fe isomer >(which likely has been lurking in the universe for a long time) makes me >wonder if other long-lived isomers have escaped attention, and written off >as statistical errors in mass measurements.
I suppose this even probable, but why choose Ni62 specifically? (Note that Fe65 is on the heavy side of the Fe isotopes). Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
