----- Original Nachricht ----
Von: Aussie Guy E-Cat <[email protected]>
An: [email protected]
Datum: 08.11.2011 13:21
Betreff: Re: [Vo]:Focardi 1998 cell replication
> I do like the idea of the Ni tube and putting the heater element inside
> for all the reasons you listed. This could result in a very simple to
> make cell as thermal heat, H2 and vacuum only needs to be applied to the
> inside of the tube. Using a stainless tube with Ni electroplated and
> electropolished on the inside could result in a nice compact design with
> little external corrosion potential. Maybe fit a collar type finned heat
> around the outside of the tube
> (http://www.aavidthermalloy.com/products/standard/320105b00000g sort of
> like this but longer) to make thermal transfer to passing fluid very
> efficient. Also make the heat sink streamlined and optimised for fluid.
> I like it. Maybe call it the Vortex cell?
If you do it, name it as you want, it is your cell.
If you overtrump Rossi and enable some 100 other persons to replicate it your
success is sure ;-). This cake is too big for one ;-)
I would like to try stuff like this, but I dont have the equipment and working
space needed.
>
> Why did they design the Piantelli cell the way they did? Maybe because
> they are not experienced engineers with grease under their fingernails
> and a lot of time at the "Coal Face" where necessity is the mother of
> invention??
>
The reason might be this: Piantelli is a biophysicist and he did other research,
when excess heat was observed.
So the cell was not originally designed for this.
So far I read Piantelli later favored his cancer research and stopped the
energy research.
Possibly he was never too much interested in energy and wanted to develop a
gamma source originally.
> As for the other replicators, may I suggest they did not have Vortex to
> call upon?
Hehe.
Peter
>
> AG
>
> On 11/8/2011 10:04 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> > A nice idea could also be: Use a nickel tube and apply heat as well as
> hydrogen /inside/ of the tube.
> > If there are any gamma rays or particles that trigger other reactions, the
> efficiency should be better.
> > Also parasitic heat losses are minimized, because the hottest surface is
> inside.
> > Also preparation (glowing in vacuum) should be easier.
> >
> > I dont understand the idea behind the Piantelli-Focardi design of
> apparatus.
> > It seems to be inefficient to me and difficult to measure.
> >
> > It must also been said, many have tried to replicate it, so far I know
> Fiat
> > and some universities are among them.
> > One group reported, they have observed all effects that Focardi&
> Piantelli have reported,
> > but could not measure excess heat.
> > Dont know, if they reported gamma rays.
> >
> > If you do a precise replication, expect it to be difficult and possibly
> without result because
> > many have already tried.
> >
> > Peter
> >
>
>
