> This is a completely different subject. Please do not mix up unrelated > topics. I asked how a person can test or falsify *your* assertion about > stage magic. I did not ask how Rossi can falsify his claims. > > If you will not cite a specific stage magic technique, there is no way > anyone can determine whether you are making a valid point or not. All > scientific assertions must be falsifiable. > >
I'm sure you have a valid point but it seems to be hitting my blind spot. Maybe you or someone else can explain it to me with different words. Seems to me: Claim: Rossi may be faking this -- I don't know how. Falsification: Someone independent and credible tested the device and determined by this method (yadadada) it's real and not fake. I think that works but maybe not. I just don't understand your issues with it. I'm being sincere and not sarcastic. I don't get what you want. Of course I don't know how Rossi might be cheating. That doesn't mean he's not.
