>
> Rossi and other other researchers have encountered opposition from people
> in other ways. Especially from people such as Yugo and Park who accuse them
> of being frauds.
>


I never said Rossi *is* a fraud.  I have said many times and many different
ways that his overall story is unlikely and that he *could be* a fraud.
That's not the same thing.

I also said that Rossi could easily prove any number of different safe ways
that he's not a fraud.  YOU (Jed) have told him the methods yourself many
times and he has never availed himself of them. You keep saying the results
of Rossi's demos were obvious but there is continuing disagreement over
that from very smart people so you could be wrong. You have said Rossi lies
at times but somehow that his lies exempt claims about his device's
performance.  That makes no sense.  You and others persist in making
unlikely excuses for Rossi.

Rossi's problem is a failure to conduct his tests properly and to get
independent testing.  The skeptics merely point this out.  They also point
out simple and safe, inexpensive ways to remedy the problems.  It's Rossi's
fault, not the fault of the skeptics,  that he doesn't follow your advice,
much less skeptics' advice.

Axil sees a cat and mouse game.  I can guarantee you that if Rossi's
machine worked and he showed it to just one reliable, intelligent, wealthy
and influential person, a robust source of fusion energy from inexpensive
fuel would be no cat and mouse game.  Not for very long.

Reply via email to