. > Oh, come now. The second photo, labeled "Hyperion in assembly", is > actually quite sharp > It's low resolution, nothing's labeled, nothing's explained, and, if the > thing really is "in assembly", then the reason it's already hooked up to a > big blue gas-tank-looking thing is not entirely clear, but those are quite > different issues from a lack of focus on the part of the camera. > > (To tell the truth, I don't really see the why or the what of this rather > strange document containing a few sentences of text, one obvious typo, and > four unexplained photographs. Who's it for? Why's it exist? Unclear.) >
Right. Mainly low resolution. I agree with the rest of what you wrote and thanks for putting it better than I did. What Defkalion has provided proves nothing except that did some work on something.
