On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Robert Leguillon < robert.leguil...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Dave, > Have you examined the earlier E-Cat tests? Before the "Fat-Cat" (or as > Nasa calls it the "Ottoman", Rossi was claiming complete vaporization under > circumstances that were obviously, I mean REALLY obviously, wrong. > This is the main reason that skeptics have been referring to the > condensed, recirculating, steam as "the steam trick" redux. > You may have reviewed all of this, and if so, I apologize. You just seem > to make some intelligent observations, and I wonder if you are missing some > background from June and earlier. > Did you read: > http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2011/37/3706appendixa1.shtml > It's a great summation of what Cude is trying to get across. Yes, he makes the same argument, but I don't agree completely with his interpretation, In the second last picture in that file, he is showing the chimney filled with water and steam above it. But steam is formed in the reactor, and has to pass through the water. Since even a small amount of steam (1%) would immediately occupy most of the space (> 90%), you should see the chimney filled mainly with steam and water broken up into some sort of a mist or climbing up the walls or something. So that's why I think you'd get a mist forming, and becoming entrained in the steam, rather than the sort of separation of steam and liquid shown in the picture.
