On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 12:17 AM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote:
I have a report that is in the hands of Ny Teknik that shows my calculations
for the October test. The results come very close to what Rossi claims for his
3 core ECAT that is used in the 1 MW plant.
>I'm not surprised. It seems to me that you start from the assumption that
>Rossi is right, and that he is producing nuclear energy, and adjust your
>analysis to fit.
Actually that is not the way I approached the problem. If I find an error in
Rossi's calculations I will report it. I have strongly defended the
thermocouple error due to placement and am extremely careful to
pick points that are least influenced by those errors. There as several time
stamps where the output is high quality vapor at the beginning of the test
which appear accurate. The temperature delta for the
accurate points is only about 3.8 C corrected. And I used the measurement data
obtained by Mats Lewan to get accurate output water flow rate. If you review
my report, you will see that my figures are substantially
below what other suggest.
You should not assume that I am not going to be fair in my attempt to analyze
the ECAT. I wish others were so inclined.
