On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Anyway, it is clear from this document and others that the management at > the Patent Office, the DoE and at some other leading institutions in the > United States do not believe that cold fusion exists. > That's called over-interpretation, something cold fusion advocates are experts in. That document says nothing about the DOE and other leading institutions, and it does not give the patent office's general opinion of cold fusion. It gives one example of a cf patent deemed inoperative. Secretary Chu is a good example. I have encountered countless others. They > are determined to prevent any cold fusion research from being funded, > because they think it is fraud, or impossible, or they think it was never > replicated. That is what they say. > Show us where they say it. I think you're making it up. I am equally sure that no expert in calorimetry who reads the paper will > find an error in it. There are no errors in this, or in any other major > cold fusion paper. > All that cold fusion literature was available to the DOE panel of 18 experts, and they judged that the occurrence of low energy nuclear reactions is not conclusively demonstrated by the evidence presented.
