Joshua, when did the DOE panel you refer to take place? Lawrence
On Nov 22, 2011, at 6:24 PM, Joshua Cude wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Anyway, it is clear from this document and others that the management at the > Patent Office, the DoE and at some other leading institutions in the United > States do not believe that cold fusion exists. > > That's called over-interpretation, something cold fusion advocates are > experts in. That document says nothing about the DOE and other leading > institutions, and it does not give the patent office's general opinion of > cold fusion. It gives one example of a cf patent deemed inoperative. > > Secretary Chu is a good example. I have encountered countless others. They > are determined to prevent any cold fusion research from being funded, because > they think it is fraud, or impossible, or they think it was never replicated. > That is what they say. > > Show us where they say it. I think you're making it up. > > I am equally sure that no expert in calorimetry who reads the paper will > find an error in it. There are no errors in this, or in any other major cold > fusion paper. > > All that cold fusion literature was available to the DOE panel of 18 experts, > and they judged that the occurrence of low energy nuclear reactions is not > conclusively demonstrated by the evidence presented. > >
