On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 1:28 AM, Aussie Guy E-Cat <[email protected]>wrote:
> You don't get it do you? That event took place in 2004. Not Nov 2011. It > has no bearing on where we are today. End of discussion. > > Except that Rothwell frequently cites pre-2004 results to validate the field. Since 2004, the results have not improved, and publication rate has not increased. There hasn't been a panel since 2004, but results are still not published in mainstream physics journals, and mainstream science still considers the field to have little merit. Rothwell said Rossi's results represent the best evidence for cold fusion ever, and yet his results do not constitute proof at all. The results that have gotten the most attention since 2004 are from 2 people with backgrounds in fraud instead of physics: Dardik and Rossi.
