Yes, he claimed they had to reduce power. Where does it say that they did this 
by reducing the hydrogen pressure?

Alan J Fletcher <[email protected]> wrote:

>At 10:29 AM 11/23/2011, Robert Leguillon wrote:
>>Where on Earth did you guys get the information that it was running 
>>and hydrogen was purged?
>
>http://pesn.com/2011/10/31/9501942_After_the_E-Cat_Test--Report_and_Q-A_with_Rossi/
>
>Description of the test installation the one megawatt Energy 
>Catalyzer is an assembly of 107 modules of ten kilowatts each 
>connected in parallel. You have noted that we did not produce one 
>megawatt hour per hour we produced less than that.
>
>***  This is because we had to lower the power of the power of the 
>plant because in self sustaining we had the temperature at a certain 
>time that rose too much. The system was difficult to modulate.
>
>
>And this also is the reason why we had to stay very, very strict. So 
>we have produced if you make the calculation we have produced.. two 
>thousand and six hundred thirty five kilowatt hours divided by.... We 
>made about 479 kilowatt hours per hour, which is not one megawatt of 
>power. But we had to choose if we wanted to go all self sustained, or 
>to go with a drive of the resistances. The customer wanted to go all 
>self sustained, because it is very important for him.
>
>http://pesn.com/2011/11/02/9501943_Rossis_E-Cat_Victory_on_Cold_Fusion_Emergence_Day--E-Day/
>
>To resolve the issue, the hydrogen pressure in all the reactors was 
>reduced. As has already been revealed by Rossi, increasing or 
>decreasing the hydrogen pressure is a way of throttling the output in 
>these systems. By reducing the hydrogen pressure, the temperatures 
>would not rise quite as high, and the system as a whole would be more 
>stable. The consequence of reducing the hydrogen pressure would be 
>that the plant would not be able to achieve a constant one megawatt 
>of output in a self-sustained mode.
>
>To achieve one megawatt of output in a stable manner, it would have 
>required a constant "drive" or input of electrical energy into the 
>resistors. Somehow, the heat from the resistors not only triggers the 
>nuclear reactions during start up, but can also allow for the system 
>to be more easily controlled. Rossi admitted during the question and 
>answer period after the system would be easier to control with a 
>"drive", and could have reached one megawatt. However, the ability of 
>the plant to operate in self sustain mode was very important for the 
>customer, so it was decided to simply reduce they hydrogen pressure, 
>and allow the system to produce less total output in a self sustained 
>mode of operation.
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to