so two article of the same FAQ are not coherent. http://faq.ecat.com/112273/how-much-ni-is-in-the-cell/ http://faq.ecat.com/112449/how-much-nickel-and-hydrogen-will-it-take-to-generate-one-megawatt-of-heat-continuously-for-six-months/
is'nt there a known issue with an error of unit that rossi admit. I remember some comment about that mistake. 10g instead of 10kg... ??? note that the cost estimated of the powder is about 1 euro/MW.6month http://faq.ecat.com/112602/if-selling-price-is-planned-for-500-euros-per-1-kw-of-output-capability-this-is-5000-euros-for-10-kw/ and that 1kG of raw nickel is 13Eur/kg on the market... incoherences... To clear the doubt, I put the question on the FAQ. http://faq.ecat.com/113004/in-faq-how-much-nickel-and-hydrogen-will-it-take-to-generate-one-megawatt-of-heat-continuously-for-six/ maybe the different base numbers we have explain the disagreement. 2011/11/24 Robert Lynn <[email protected]> > Repeat from earlier in this thread: > > http://faq.ecat.com/112449/how-much-nickel-and-hydrogen-will-it-take-to-generate-one-megawatt-of-heat-continuously-for-six-months/ > 1MW needs 10kg Nickel powder, so about 100g per ecat (will run for 6 > months) + 1g of hydrogen per ecat per day (in reality far less than this is > used, but there will be leakage etc). > > > On 23 November 2011 20:33, Alain dit le Cycliste > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> that is not what rossi says on the FAQ. >> he talks about 10mg/kW of H, and 100mg/kW of Ni >> >> however, in my previeux computation I'me made a mistake... >> 1MW should need 10g of H >> and 100g of Ni >> >> if the number for Ni is Ok, but H is a bit exagerated, >> for 100g of Ni you need 100g/59=1.7g hydrogen... >> >> strange it fall on that number... but maybe it is that rossi exagerate >> the need of H. >> maybe also he count not only the loading of H (1.7g), but also the leaks >> on 6 month (8h it seems) >> >> anyway without knowing the machine and it's behavioor it is like guessing >> the gas consumption behavior of a car, >> not having driven any, not used the engine. >> >> 2011/11/23 Jouni Valkonen <[email protected]> >> >>> 2011/11/23 Jed Rothwell <[email protected]>: >>> >>> Here however the measured value was 1000 fold too little, because used >>> amount of hydrogen should have been something in order of 1.7 kg that >>> was initially reported. Not 1.7 grams. >>> >> >> >
